In the 1990s, David Currie and Texas Baptists Committed
fought tooth-and-nail to keep Texas Baptists free to be faithful. As the
Fundamentalists, in the late 1980s, neared their goal of achieving full control
of the Southern Baptist Convention, they set their sights on the Baptist
General Convention of Texas (BGCT) . . . because it was far and away the
largest state convention, owning the most assets and institutions, the most
prized of which was . . . Baylor University. More than anything, Paul Pressler
wanted control of Baylor.
But he didn’t get it.
To gain control of the BGCT, they used the same strategy
that had been so successful in the SBC . . . go after the presidency and its
appointive powers . . . win the presidency enough years consecutively to place
a majority of people on all convention boards and committees who have pledged
their loyalty to your cause, and the BGCT will be yours.
In the 1980s, they had caught SBC leadership napping. SBC
leaders trusted the people’s wisdom to see through the lies told by
Fundamentalists, to resist their use of secular political tactics, and to hold
to the Baptist principles that they were so blatantly violating.
Texas Baptist leadership learned from the mistakes of their
SBC colleagues. They determined that, to keep Texas Baptists free, they would
need to organize, educate, and fight. If Fundamentalists expected to catch
Texas Baptist leadership napping, they were in for a rude awakening.
Led by David Currie, Texas Baptists Committed organized the
state. David traveled the state, speaking to churches, educating Texas Baptists
on what was at stake, and mobilizing them to vote for Moderate candidates at
the BGCT Annual Meeting.
As for Baylor, President Herbert Reynolds and the Board of Regents voted for freedom and a measure of independence from the BGCT, ensuring that – if Fundamentalists were successful in taking control of the BGCT – Baylor would nevertheless be saved.
In 1998, after losing election after election, the Fundamentalists
gave up their efforts to win the BGCT presidency and formed the Southern
Baptists of Texas Convention (SBTC). Their strategy shifted from controlling
the BGCT to luring BGCT churches to leave the BGCT & join the SBTC. That
has been their strategy ever since . . . though Paige Patterson’s overtures to
David Hardage and the BGCT in 2015 cause me to question whether there is a new
strategy of infiltration & influence toward current BGCT leadership.
The BGCT executive director position has always been a balancing act . . .
balancing various constituencies and priorities. It has been even moreso since
1990. There is a spectrum along which BGCT-affiliated churches reside, a
spectrum that is not all that balanced. Though the BGCT was kept out of
Fundamentalist hands, and BGCT churches by-and-large hewed to Baptist
principles of freedom, most BGCT churches – and the people in their pews –
continue to support the Southern Baptist Convention.
The Cooperative Baptist
Fellowship (CBF) – which was formed in 1991 by Moderates who no longer had a
home in the SBC – is still supported by very few, relatively speaking,
BGCT-affiliated churches. Let’s be honest – most Texas Baptists consider CBF “liberal.”
Ironically, this perception of “liberalism” (the same accusation that
Fundamentalists leveled against SBC seminary professors in the 1970s &
1980s) is based, essentially, on CBF’s faithful recognition of the freedom
inherent in the Baptist distinctives of Bible freedom, soul freedom, church
freedom, and religious freedom, as described so cogently by Walter B. Shurden
in his book, The Baptist Identity: Four
Fragile Freedoms (1993, Smyth & Helwys Publishing). (And fragile they
are!)
Fundamentalists will say that “the Controversy” was an
argument over correct doctrine. Nothing could be further from the truth. We
Moderates did not seek to control how Fundamentalists interpret the Bible. We
sought to focus on those things that unite us as Baptists rather than on those
that divide us . . . first and foremost, our love for Jesus and our desire to
share Him with a hurting world . . . our worship of a gracious Father who
created and sustains us . . . and our need for the work of the Holy Spirit
within us to motivate, guide, and comfort us.
We Moderates recognized that none of us – Moderate or
Fundamentalist – has a monopoly on God’s truth. We are all imperfect creatures,
trying our best to understand God’s Word – both the Word made flesh and the
written Word – and the call of that Word upon our lives. As my Daddy told me
many times, “we should never presume to
know the mind of God.”
Therefore, we can cooperate with each other in humility,
cooperating as sisters and brothers, to share Christ. Missions have unified
Baptists from our earliest days.
But Fundamentalists said no, you must agree to our interpretation
of certain Scriptures and even our description of Scripture (“inerrant”), or
else we don’t want to have anything to do with you.
Moderates didn’t leave voluntarily . . . we were told to leave.
In my tenure as executive director of Texas Baptists
Committed (January 2011-July 2017), our focus has been on helping churches as
they search for a pastor. The Southern Baptists of Texas Convention (SBTC) has
an effective network, just as their Fundamentalist forefathers had in the
1980s. When a church loses a pastor, the SBTC finds it out quickly and offers
an interim pastor and proposes candidates for pastor.
We’ve heard this story
from so many corners that it appears to be typical – that when an SBTC
candidate goes before a search committee, he (always he) tells the search
committee he is a servant pastor, that he has no political agenda, and so
forth. Then, when he is called as pastor, it isn’t long before he fires anyone
on the staff who dares disagree with his interpretation of scripture. He soon
begins to impose his will on the church and lead it away from the BGCT by
slandering the BGCT. That church inevitably winds up in conflict and
dissension, a broken fellowship that takes years to repair and, in many cases,
is broken beyond repair.
At TBC, my priority has been to develop our own network –
which we did in 2014, with the TBC Advisory Network – of pastors and laity who would
keep us informed of churches going pastorless, a network of people to whom we could
turn with questions from search committees about the qualifications and track
records of prospective pastors, and a network that would keep us supplied with
resumes of reliable prospective pastors.
Unfortunately, strapped for cash, TBC
has operated with only one executive staff member – me. That has handicapped us
in terms of getting the word out to churches. Also, our TBC Advisory Network
didn’t respond to my requests for information as I had hoped they would. Year
after year, I get about four or five calls a year from search committees asking
for my help. That doesn’t make a dent in Texas. So we haven’t had the impact I
had hoped we would.
The SBTC continues to steal churches.
But that isn’t my only concern. Many of us are disturbed by
the rightward, inward turn of the BGCT under David Hardage’s leadership. When
David was announced as executive director in January 2012, he immediately
announced that the BGCT’s policy of regarding homosexual behavior as sinful
would remain in place. I guess I understand why he felt that was necessary –
because the SBTC had lied repeatedly about the BGCT’s stance on this issue.
Nevertheless, in May 2015, I raised this issue with him,
following a warning letter he had sent to churches and pastors. My point to
David was that churches were increasingly having to wrestle with how to
minister to the gay people in their congregation and community, and his
hard-line stance toward pastors and churches was making their task more
difficult. I asked him, “Couldn’t you just not make an issue of it? Just
recognize the autonomy of the local church and let them minister to these people
in the way they feel led of the Holy Spirit.” David replied, “I don’t know.”
I thought his reply was more encouraging than a “no.” Then
came 2016 and his letter to Wilshire Baptist Church of Dallas and First Baptist
Church of Austin. At our TBC Breakfast the following week, David didn’t attend,
but Steve Vernon, BGCT associate executive director, did. In my remarks, I
called Hardage’s action a violation of local church autonomy. Later that
morning, the convention voted – narrowly – to affirm his stance. In February,
the BGCT Executive Board made it official – Wilshire, FBC Austin, and Lake
Shore in Waco were out.
I wrote a blog post, “When family doesn’t want you anymore.”
So a lot of us are concerned that the BGCT is focusing on
division rather than unity, exclusion rather than inclusion. Not exactly the
spirit I see in Jesus Christ.
David Hardage embraces Paige Patterson and gives the back of his hand to Bill
Jones, George Mason, Griff Martin, and Kyndall Rae Rothaus.
My only encouragement is this: David Hardage is NOT the
Baptist General Convention of Texas. Since I made my remarks at that November
TBC Breakfast, numerous BGCT staffers have thanked me privately. Also, please
note that, in my remarks that morning, my disagreement with the BGCT was
prefaced by all I love about the BGCT.
The Baptist General Convention of Texas is its Hunger
Offering (which Wilshire began and has now been told will not be allowed to support
any longer); its Christian Life Commission; its nine wonderful universities with
their great faculty and students; Buckner International; Disaster Relief . . .
and I could go on. So I haven’t given up on the BGCT; I still love the BGCT . .
. and miss it, because David Hardage and a majority of messengers have said
they don’t want me anymore.
There will be no official “watchdog” anymore; as individuals
and churches, all of us have to be watchdogs, supporting those things we love
about the BGCT (those of you who are still allowed to support it), praying for
it, and holding its leadership accountable for the bedrock principles . . . those "fragile freedoms" . . . on which
Baptists have stood for over 400 years.
Is the BGCT becoming “SBC lite”? I hope not, I pray not.